Here are the some of the alternatives that have been proposed:
Do not be deluded by those who propose a Flat Tax, for this is still an an Income Tax. While less complex than the current income tax, there will still be deductions, allowances, loopholes, the IRS, and Tax Court. The main beneficiaries will be the rich, who will see their tax rate reduced.
This is a much better option than a Flat-Rate Income Tax. In particular, no tax forms or tax returns will be needed for individuals, and it would eliminate the need for the IRS. The main drawback of the VAT is that it is complicated to administer and collect. The cost of compliance is estimated at nearly $5 billion per year (which is still about a hundred times less than the current Income Tax).
The NRST is by far the best of the tax alternatives:
The NRST is a progressive tax because this rebate to all Social Security cardholders reimburses everyone for all NRST paid up to the poverty level. Besides shielding the poor (and everyone else) from tax up to the poverty level, this turns the 15% flat rate into a progressive tax (the more you spend, the higher the tax rate). If you made and spent exactly the poverty level, ($18,588 for a family of four) you would pay 15% in tax equal to $2,788, and receive a rebate of $2,788, for a net of ZERO taxes. The same family of four with $40,000 in income -- if they spent every last nickel on retail consumption -- would pay $6,000 in sales taxes. After a rebate of $2,788, net taxes would be $3,212, which works out to an effective rate of 8%! The wealthy would pay a rate of 8% to 15% -- a small rebate versus tens of thousands of dollars of spending doesn't significantly affect the 15% rate.
The frugal, who save proportionately more, will pay more moderate rates and be justly rewarded for postponing consumption, and helping grow our economy with savings and investment. And, of course even the frugal, when they finally do spend their wealth (or after they give it away) the wealth will be taxed.
But the rebate is icing on the cake -- even if there was NO rebate you'd still come out ahead. Think about it -- would you rather pay 15% to 30% of everything you earn in federal income tax, or 15% of everything you spend in federal sales tax? Unless you're spending more than you earn, 15% of your spending is a lower tax bill. (And remember interest on home mortgage payments isn't taxed, neither is education or training, neither is savings or investment.) The vast majority of people will pay less tax, even though the same amount of revenue is raised because:
No special interest loopholes, less tax cheating, no incentive to hide money offshore, no free ride for imports. But it gets even better, because...
We all know there's no such thing as a free lunch. The reason this reform is so painless is that our current system is so incredibly wasteful that the cost savings pay for much of the new tax! Right now we're ultimately paying up to $300 billion in compliance costs, plus all of the business income taxes that are built into consumer prices. $228 billion in compliance costs works out to over $2,000 for every individual taxpayer -- not even counting the hidden tax you pay in prices for the actual corporate income tax itself!
Lower prices includes the cost of money -- the interest which makes your mortgage payment so large. Right now tax-free municipal bonds pay two full percentage points less in interest versus regular bonds on which the interest is taxed. When all savings and investment are tax-free all interest rates will drop in a similar fashion -- including refinancing on your home mortgage. What would 2% off the interest rate do for your monthly mortgage payment?
Lower prices will help American businesses get more competitive and hire more workers. Lower prices will help the poor who spend almost all of their income on necessities, poor people who, right now, don't get a rebate for all the corporate income taxes and compliance costs hidden in the price of goods. But the biggest dollar benefit will go to you, the average consumer in this country who has been paying THREE sets of taxes, your income tax, business income taxes, and $2,000 worth of business costs to complying with the income tax. The NRST eliminates three unfair taxes and replaces them with one FAIR tax.
Think about the political implications for a minute. No income tax for politicians to sell loopholes to special interests. This will go a long way to cleaning up all the corrupt money in politics. The bottom line is unarguable -- what could be fairer than protecting the poor 100%, and then everyone contributing to government in exact proportion to what they get from society in consumption?
It is fair because it is easy to understand, obey, and enforce. The sales taxes charged by 45 states can be dovetailed with the NRST -- and states are given a financial incentive to harmonize their tax base (not an unfunded mandate). The NRST is simple and clear-cut to enforce. Just as importantly, it's much easier to track 20 million retail businesses than 150 million independent individual/corporate taxpayers. In California the state sales tax collects 90% of its' revenue from 8% of the retailers -- and there are only 1 million of these big retailers nationwide. Tax evasion will be that much more difficult, and enforcement that much easier.
It's even fair to the retailers who have to tweak their state sales tax system to collect the NRST as well. Retailers will receive .5% of all collections as a reimbursement for their time and trouble -- no more unpaid burden to comply with an impossible income tax system. If you were a retailer, would you rather continue your current income tax hassles, or once a month multiply your sales by 15%?
It is fair because the IRS and their flagrant abuse of civil liberties and common sense will finally be eliminated. Never again will you have to fear an audit, or dread the annual paperwork nightmare of April 15th.
Rep. Bill Archer, Chairman of the House Ways and Means committee cites a recent survey of major corporations in Europe and Japan. They were asked "If the US abolished its income tax and went to a sales tax, would that have any impact on your decisions?" 80% said they would build factories in the US; 20% said they would move their international headquarters to the U.S. To paraphrase Ross Perot -- the giant sucking sound you hear is investment, growth and jobs flowing into the United States of America. An interesting question is -- if this is the reaction of foreign firms, how fast will American entrepreneurs expand?
| Imagine Never Filling Out an IRS Form, Ever Again! |
Imagine a world where you actually receive 100% of your paycheck (less payroll taxes), plus your rebate. Imagine saving and investing tax-free. How easy would it be to build a retirement, put your kids through college, or even become financially independent while you're still young enough to enjoy it? Wouldn't you like to live, and work, and invest, in an economy running in overdrive from an investment boom? What would that do for your retirement? For your children and grandchildren?
Public Domain Page - Please pass on to others.